home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=93TT2007>
- <title>
- July 05, 1993: Reviews:Cinema
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1993
- July 05, 1993 Hitting Back At Terrorists
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- REVIEWS, Page 58
- CINEMA
- Modern Romance
- </hdr>
- <body>
- <p>By RICHARD SCHICKEL
- </p>
- <qt>
- <l>TITLE: Sleepless In Seattle</l>
- <l>DIRECTOR: Nora Ephron</l>
- <l>WRITERS: Nora Ephron, David S. Ward and Jeff Arch</l>
- </qt>
- <p> THE BOTTOM LINE: This comedy of long-distance love is too long
- and too distant.
- </p>
- <p> Sam Baldwin (Tom Hanks) is an architect in Seattle, a recent
- widower unable to overcome his bereavement. Annie Reed (Meg
- Ryan) is a no-nonsense newspaperwoman in Baltimore, about to
- settle for a marriage more convenient than stirring.
- </p>
- <p> They don't meet cute. As a matter of fact, they don't meet at
- all until the end of the movie. She hears him on a radio shrink's
- call-in program, into which he's been plugged by his eight-year-old
- son Jonah (Ross Malinger), who thinks it's time for Dad to get
- a life. Lots of other women respond to him too. Rue is a good
- emotional color for him, and he wears it well--with a manliness
- that avoids self-pity and promises loyalty to anyone who wins
- his heart. But of all the letters listeners send in, it's Annie's
- that his son likes best, and so the boy begins to maneuver a
- meeting against a movieful of odds.
- </p>
- <p> It's a sweet conceit, taking into account both the curious new
- ways we make connections along our electronic highways and romance's
- age-old need to crank up passion by placing frustrations in
- true love's path. Given that many of the traditional obstacles
- like class, ethnic and religious differences are readily overcome
- these days by enlightened people, it's smart to recognize that
- about the only thing left to distance people is, yes, distance--good old basic geography.
- </p>
- <p> It may be, however, that Sleepless in Seattle is too smart for
- its own good. For clever as it is conceptually, it violates
- the most basic rule of romantic-comedy construction. If boy
- doesn't meet girl, then the drama of boy losing girl and the
- final satisfaction of boy getting girl cannot happen. The complications
- in this movie are all logistical. They are never confrontational,
- as they so giddily were in the classic comedies of muddled love,
- the spirit of which co-writer and director Nora Ephron has said
- she wanted to recapture.
- </p>
- <p> To compensate, she creates, as it were, sub-conflicts. Annie's
- fiance (Bill Pullman) is shown to be, quite literally, a drip
- (allergies make his nose run); the woman Sam takes up with (Barbara
- Garrick) has a grating laugh. The movie condescends to both
- of them rather unfunnily. And, anyway, they begin to seem like
- time fillers, something to divert us from the fact that this
- film really has no center. Hanks and Ryan are, as usual, charming,
- and so are Malinger as destiny's underage enabler, Gaby Hoffmann
- as his girlfriend, eagerly egging him on, and Rosie O'Donnell
- as Ryan's newspaper pal. They are all given some chuckly lines
- to say, but no killers. Like everything else in this movie,
- they lack madness, and they fail to draw you out of yourself
- into a truly absorbing alternative reality. Mostly, Sleepless
- in Seattle leaves you feeling restless in the audience.
- </p>
-
- </body>
- </article>
- </text>
-
-